Programme partnerships

Bring the operational questions behind an education collaboration into a workable plan. IESG supports institutions preparing programme relationships, with attention to authority, resources, responsibilities and the decisions required before implementation.

Discuss a programme partnership

Clarify the intended collaboration

The first task is to describe the activity accurately. It may involve a progression arrangement, a programme delivered through a partner, a recruitment initiative or another defined form of institutional cooperation.

We establish the participating entities, intended learners, delivery locations and the contribution each organisation proposes. This provides the basis for deciding what coordination is required and which approvals sit outside the engagement.

Agree the objective and boundaries

A partnership brief should say what the parties want to achieve, what provision is included and what is expressly outside the proposed activity. It should identify any dependency on programme approval, intellectual property, academic recognition or local operating permission.

The brief also helps separate an exploratory discussion from a commitment to launch. A realistic decision process gives the parties time to resolve substantive questions before presenting an offer to learners or other partners.

Writing an institutional partnership brief

Map the responsibilities

Depending on the activity, the responsibility schedule can address curriculum and academic oversight, teaching resources, recruitment, admissions, learner information, assessment, records, fees, complaints and continuity.

Each responsibility needs an accountable entity and an operational contact. Shared work also needs a decision rule: who can approve a change, resolve an inconsistency or suspend an activity if a necessary condition is no longer met?

Examine feasibility and resources

The parties need to understand the staffing, facilities, systems, materials and time required to deliver the proposal. We can coordinate the information needed to test those arrangements against the intended activity.

An implementation plan should record assumptions, dependencies and outstanding decisions. It should not treat an unconfirmed resource or approval as available merely because it appears in a presentation.

Confirm programme rights and academic authority

The organisations entitled to grant programme rights or academic approval must establish those permissions. The relevant documents should identify the entity, provision, location, period and conditions covered.

IESG can coordinate information and questions around this work. It does not grant degree-awarding powers, institutional licences, curriculum authorisation or academic recognition through a project-management service.

Prepare for implementation

An agreed working plan can identify decision milestones, document responsibilities, staff preparation, public-information checks and the conditions that must be satisfied before an activity starts.

The plan should also identify who communicates changes to learners and partners. Descriptions used in recruitment should match the programme actually approved and the responsibilities accepted by the participating organisations.

Keep changes under review

A change to the delivery entity, location, curriculum, learner group or operating arrangement may require a fresh decision. The partnership needs a way to recognise that change, assess its effect and obtain the appropriate agreement before implementation.

Regular review should consider both the work carried out and unresolved matters. A record of meetings is useful only when it supports an accountable decision or action.

Possible deliverables

The scope can include an institutional brief, responsibility schedule, information-request record, implementation plan, decision log and a summary of pre-launch conditions. Each output records its status so that exploratory material is not mistaken for an approved programme arrangement.

Questions institutions ask

Can support begin before a partner has been selected?

Yes. A clear brief and responsibility outline can help an institution identify the type of organisation it needs and the questions to resolve before selection.

Can you coordinate the review of an existing arrangement?

The work can focus on an existing programme relationship, provided the scope identifies the decisions, information and institutional contacts involved.