Governance and accountability

Clear accountability is part of delivering an institutional service. IESG distinguishes responsibility for company commitments, project delivery, information handling and decisions made by external organisations.

Responsibility for company commitments

INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION SERVICES GROUP LTD is responsible for commitments it accepts in its own name. An engagement must identify the contracting party and the person authorised to confirm its scope and commercial arrangements.

Statements about a platform, partner or certification scheme should identify the organisation responsible for the relevant rule or decision. The use of a shared communication channel does not merge the responsibilities of separate organisations.

Company information · Organisation and relationships

Approving the work

Before work is accepted, the proposed scope should be considered against the available information, appropriate competence, capacity and any relevant authorisation. The engagement record should identify the deliverables, client inputs and important dependencies.

Changes that affect scope, fees, responsibilities or delivery arrangements require a recorded agreement. Informal discussion should not be relied on as approval for additional work or a change in an external authority's requirements.

Project responsibility and oversight

Each engagement identifies a service contact and a client contact. Their responsibilities include coordinating information, recording important decisions and bringing issues to the attention of someone able to resolve them.

The person delivering a task should have a clear route for raising a matter that exceeds their competence or authority. Review arrangements should be proportionate to the work and should address material errors before an output is relied upon.

Interests that may affect the work

Relevant employment, commercial, advisory or referral interests must be considered when assigning work. The appropriate response may include disclosure, restricted access, a different assignment or declining an activity that cannot be carried out responsibly.

For an ICEQC-related engagement, the support role must remain distinguishable from the certification functions reserved to ICEQC. Any case-specific restriction takes precedence over an ordinary commercial workflow.

Conflicts and referrals · ICEQC roles and independence

Personnel and external service providers

The engagement should identify any external contribution material to delivery. The work assigned, use of client information and responsibility for the resulting output must be understood before that contribution begins.

An external contributor's professional credentials do not automatically extend the authority of IESG. Likewise, becoming an IESG delivery partner does not confer an independent organisation's authorisation or approval.

Service concerns and escalation

Clients and other affected people can raise a concern about IESG's services, communications or conduct. The complaint route explains the information needed, review arrangements and how to ask for a further consideration of the response.

A concern about an external organisation's decision must reach the body entitled to address it. We distinguish those routes so that a person does not lose the opportunity to use the appropriate procedure.

Raise a service concern

Information responsibility

Records should be relevant to the engagement, accessible to the people who need them and protected from unnecessary disclosure. The institution remains responsible for the accuracy and authority of information it supplies; IESG is responsible for handling that information within its agreed role.

Requests concerning personal information have a separate contact route. Information about the use of this website and enquiry data appears in the Privacy notice.

Privacy notice · Make a privacy request